Veterinary & scientific evidence
- Peer-reviewed research
- Veterinary textbooks and manuals
- Government guidance
- University extension guidance
- Documented veterinary review
Flockline Trust & Evidence
This is the public record behind Flockline’s educational chicken-health guidance: sources, methods, safety rules, evaluations, limitations, changes, and corrections.
01 · Our approach
Flockline is designed to help backyard chicken keepers notice what matters, understand the limits of those observations, take an appropriate next step, and escalate when the risk of waiting is too high.
Flockline is educational support. It does not examine a bird, perform diagnostic tests, prescribe treatment, or replace a veterinarian.
02 · Evidence hierarchy
A source label tells you where information came from. It does not automatically make every claim strong. We also consider study design, species, sample size, directness, consistency, limitations, and recency.
Repeated owner observations from public Reddit and backyard-chicken communities can reveal questions, language, and patterns worth investigating.
They are owner observations, not medical evidence.
Anonymised aggregate patterns could eventually show symptom frequency, seasonality, recovery timelines, or observation behaviour.
Status: disabled. No insight is published before privacy approval, cohort thresholds, and small-cell suppression exist.
03 · Evidence graph
A flat bibliography can show what was cited. A graph can show which claim a source supports, what qualifies it, which reviewer signed off, which version changed, and where the gaps remain.
Example topic node · no score claimed
Supporting and qualifying studies, veterinary reviews, related observations, conditions, last update, versions, limitations, and knowledge gaps connect here.
04 · Sources library
Each record carries authors, publication, year, study type, species, sample size, quality state, summary, limitations, DOI, PubMed, and external links where applicable.
Open the full source library05 · Clinical review
A reviewer record will show qualifications, area of expertise, pages reviewed, last review date, and version history.
Flockline currently publishes no clinical reviewer roster. We will not imply veterinary sign-off before identity, qualifications, scope, consent, and page-level review are verified.
Read the reviewer policy06 · Editorial methodology
The method covers topic selection, source selection, community research, conflicting evidence, review cadence, retirement, and corrections.
Select
Prioritise high-risk, common, confusing, underserved, or materially changed topics.
Compare
Record differences in population, setting, design, date, and limitations instead of forcing consensus.
Maintain
Review by risk, retire unsafe or superseded guidance, and keep a public correction record.
07 · Safety policy
Flockline should avoid diagnosis claims, use calibrated language, and escalate on red flags, rapid deterioration, suspected reportable disease, severe injury, or meaningful human-health risk.
Flockline cannot examine a bird or replace local veterinary and animal-health services. If a bird is in severe distress, rapidly worsening, badly injured, unable to breathe normally, experiencing uncontrolled bleeding, or part of unusual sudden flock deaths, seek professional help promptly.
08 · Product evaluation
Hennie will be evaluated across realistic chicken-health scenarios with versioned rubrics, configuration IDs, manual scoring, adjudication, and known limitations.
Current status: benchmark design published; no results published.
Critical-advice pass rate and critical failure count.
Awaiting baselineUrgent recall, non-urgent specificity, and false-alarm rate.
Awaiting baselineValidity, relevance, and whether the source supports the attached claim.
Awaiting baselineSafety outcome agreement across paraphrases and repeated runs.
Awaiting baseline09 · Transparency
Reports will cover knowledge updates, model changes, reviewer additions, new evidence, retired guidance, known limitations, and corrections.