Editorial methodology · v1.0.0

How guidance earns its place.

Flockline starts with the decision a keeper needs to make, traces every material claim to evidence, preserves uncertainty, and records meaningful changes.

Published: 28 July 2026Review model: risk based

Topic selection

Choose by consequence, confusion, and need.

Topics are prioritised when they are safety-critical, common, confusing, underserved, changing, or central to a keeper’s next decision.

Search demand and community discussion may reveal a missing question. They do not determine the answer or its medical validity.

Source selection

Match the evidence to the claim.

We prefer direct poultry evidence and record the population, species, setting, sample, study design, limitations, and date.

Find

Search veterinary literature, textbooks, government resources, extension services, and documented expert review.

Check

Confirm identity, publication details, directness, study design, sample, limitations, and whether the source supports the exact claim.

Connect

Link the source to a stable claim or topic node with a rationale: supports, qualifies, contradicts, or supersedes.

Community intelligence

Useful for discovery. Never a shortcut to proof.

Public Reddit and backyard-chicken discussions can expose repeated observations, confusing language, practical constraints, and questions not answered well elsewhere.

Flockline aggregates and paraphrases. We do not publish private-group content, usernames, personal information, or a single anecdote as a pattern. Community patterns always state that they are not medical evidence.

Conflicting evidence

Do not manufacture consensus.

When sources disagree, the graph records the disagreement and the reason it may exist.

Compare

  • Species and population
  • Backyard versus commercial setting
  • Study design and sample
  • Outcome definition
  • Date and local context

Communicate

  • What is consistent
  • What is uncertain
  • What evidence is indirect
  • What safer action remains appropriate
  • What research is still needed

Maintenance

Update by risk; retire with a record.

Safety-critical guidance is reviewed sooner. Guidance is retired when unsafe, superseded, unsupported, materially misleading, or no longer maintainable.

Trigger
New or changed evidence
Assess whether claims, uncertainty, safety language, or links must change.
Review
Trigger
Correction or safety signal
Triage immediately, preserve previous wording, record the reason, and publish the correction.
Priority
Trigger
Stale or broken source
Reconcile metadata, replace only with equivalent or stronger support, and retain version history.
Maintain